The cases appear to support the proposition that if multiple offenses arise from the same episode, a conviction for one of them makes ALL of them ineligible for expunction. However, I should say that in Aytonk (which most/all of these cases seem to refer back to), defendant was charged with only ONE count of theft and pleaded guilty to a closer theft offenses?..THUS, this case does not concern two separate offenses?. Also, in Ex parte E.E.H.,...